Mutiny on Gray Wolf Peak

Mutiny on Gray Wolf Peak

Page Type Page Type: Article

Preface

This narrative/trip report/article is written in an effort to solidify the lessons I learned while leading a group of 12 intrepid climbers on the NE Ridge of Gray Wolf Peak on 08.16.08 and to share with the reader the events that led to a hazardous yet uneventful off-route descent. I will not name names or assign blame to anyone (except myself), nor will I attempt to pass the buck on to anyone else, because this is, after all, an introspective look into my leadership skill or lack thereof.



Mutiny on Gray Wolf

Mutinies have occurred since ancient times when hunter-gatherers followed the alpha male until they realized that continuing to follow would prove hazardous to their well-being, whereupon the troupe either killed the old leader or simply abandoned him to his fate. Thankfully, behaviors have become more civil, and the mutiny I experienced was more an abandonment.
South Face - Upper Riddell Lake BasinGray Wolf Peak


So here is the short of it: 12 members of a famous NW mountain-climbing society set out at 7:30 from the trailhead, grinding up the steep trail to Riddell Lake, skirting its south side to a low saddle on the south ridge of Gray Wolf, then down to Scenic Lake and up a short Class 4 section to gain the southeast ridge. I set a moderate pace, with a couple of stops for huckleberry picking and to allow the slower members to catch up. Everyone was hiking well and seemed anxious to reach our destination. As a result, our progress was steady, and we were on the summit by 2:00 p.m.
This was rather impressive due to the size of the group and the semi-technical nature of a couple of short sections of this wonderful ridge climb.
From the Summit of Gray Wolf PeakViews North from the summit of Gray Wolf Peak


The experience level of this group ran the gamut from very experienced-- one fellow has climbed all of the technical peaks in Glacier National Park-- to the very inexperienced-- a young member from New Jersey who had just joined the Society the day before and for whom Gray Wolf was to be only his 2nd big peak, the first being Trapper Peak, a casual walk-up. There were many seasoned climbers who filled out the ranks, though, and most of us were in the 45+ age range.

At this point I should elaborate just a bit on the challenging sections of this route. The first difficulty is a short but exposed downclimb to a saddle on the ridge. I mention this section mostly to indicate that every climber seemed to negotiate this terrain fairly easily, and a couple of members were very helpful in guiding the foot placements of a pair of unsure compatriots.
Descent route into SaddleExpand to original size to view topo.
We paused for a lunch break at the saddle and admired spectacular views of the Mission Mountains to the north, the Swan Range to the east, the Rattlesnakes to the south, and the Bitterroot Mountains to the west.

The second difficulty, just a short scramble above our lunch saddle, is a near-vertical 75' section of blocky climbing in the 5.2 range. The holds for hands and feet are all there but not always obvious, especially to the less experienced climber. I gave a short safety talk and led the way up this wonderfully exposed pitch.
The Crux
The only loose rock on the entire pitch is at the top, and I waited there and cautioned every climber not to attempt to use it as a handhold (though some did anyway). I was able to assess each climber's abilities as he ascended this pitch and was pleased that only a couple of guys had any difficulty, and even then it was only for one short awkward step.
The Crux SectionSaintgrizzly gets ready to negotiate the "awkward" step
So my mind was at ease, confident that with a little help, everybody could get back down this section. Since the top of this step is a rather small ledge, and the remainder of the ridge route is marked by cairns and fairly obvious, I allowed climbers to proceed at their own pace up to the summit. I took the opportunity to pull up the rear at this point and talk climbing with one of the least experienced members of our team. We reached the summit just a few minutes behind everyone else.

This part of the narrative begins to get the heart of the matter because while enjoying the summit views, I heard two members of the team (for the purposes of this narrative, I will call them "Maverick" and "Goose") talk about what they thought was an alternate descent couloir. At the time I did not think that they were entirely serious about going down that way, but as we were putting our packs back on to start our descent, I again overheard that Maverick was going to give the gully a look-see. I do not know why alarm bells didn't go off in my mind; I really did not think that anybody would leave the group and head into unknown terrain. Further, it was Maverick who had had the most difficulty with the rock pitch, so in my mind, I mistakenly thought there was no way this guy would strike off on his own. This obviously in retrospect was my best opportunity to nip this crap in the bud, but I honestly did not anticipate the events that were about to unfold.

Maverick practically ran down the upper ridge. The next I saw of this guy, he was 200 vertical feet down a bowling alley of a steep couloir 200 feet west of our planned descent route. Goose said that Maverick was just going to check it out to see if it would “go.” This was my next opportunity to halt the defection, but there were several rumblings from other members to the effect that if it did “go,” it would save considerable time.

In my defense, I did say that I was certain that the gully got progressively steeper and narrower, that it very likely cliffed out, and that I figured this guy would soon be starting his slow climb back up to the rest of the group. As we all waited and watched, he found a way down through a very steep section and descended to where he could see the snowfield below. At this point he yelled back up that he was mostly certain that the couloir would “go.” Several people immediately began descending, and one well-respected member of the group asked me if I was okay with attempting the couloir route, to which I replied that I was not okay with it at all. I further stated that the die had been cast when the fellow had headed off route, that several people were determined to descend by that gully, and that I was unwilling to split the group up. It became apparent to me that I was no longer the climbing leader of this group. Even though I still had the ultimate responsibility for the group, our lot was now cast with the least competent rock climber in the group leading the descent into the unknown.

My last opportunity to correct the mistakes passed when, as the last person, I began to descend into this unknown chasm. With each step I grew more and more angry because I began to fully recognize the objective hazards that the group was now subjected to. There were 12 helmet-less people stacked directly on top of each other, in a steep couloir with nowhere to go if a big rock got to rolling. I had not called for helmets being mandatory because I knew that on the route we climbed there was minimal rockfall hazard. Needless to say, there were several tricky sections that slowed the least experienced amongst us to a literal and figurative crawl. There were also a couple of sections that could only be safely descended one person at a time. The last steep part just above the snow took over an hour and a half to get the last six of us through.
Paintbrush & Gray WolfA careful examination of this wonderful photo will show the couloir that we took. Look for a left-slanting gash just left of the deep saddle and steep step on the right skyline; it starts just below the small triangular snow patch and terminates at a long snowfield that slants back right.

Once through the couloir, we were dumped out onto a 35-degree snowfield nearly 250 feet long. Due to the lateness of the day, the snow was starting to harden, and several people slipped and fell, resulting in inglorious glissades. As there was no snow on our set route, I had not called for an ice ax or crampons as mandatory equipment, either. One of the members had never even been on an alpine snowfield, and I thank goodness that he was not injured when he glissaded out of control into the rocks below. To the credit of the guys who were already down, they were able to break his slide and slow him down a bit before he hit the rocks. Another member had the previous year experienced a very harrowing slip on a large snowfield on McDonald Peak, and it had left him very unsure of himself on steep snow.

I think kudos are warranted to the entire group for the extreme care with which they descended; I witnessed several amazing catches of rocks that had just started rolling. There also formed an impromptu information chain, where the fellow who just gotten down a tough section would pause and guide the person behind on hand and foot placements. I also think there was a bit of providence at work because we had all made it down without injury and, maybe more importantly, because Maverick was nowhere in sight when I got to the bottom of the snowfield, for I am quite certain I would have punched him square in the nose.

The group fractured further as some of the people who had long drives ahead of them did not want to wait for the slower walkers, so they asked for, and were granted, permission to head on down of their own accord.

What is amazing to me is that they even asked because at that point, I am sure my anger at the situation was apparent to everyone, and, of course, it was directed outward at the a**hole that had jumped off route. I know that his decision was made out of fear of downclimbing the 5.2 step, and I imagine that his fear could have been at least partially allayed by a well-timed encouragement. I do not know for sure if Maverick would have listened if I had yelled at him to “turn around and get back on route,” but I do know I should have yelled. I think now that it would have been proper to split the group to avoid exposing any of the rest of them to excessive hazard. Perhaps I should have appointed a lieutenant to lead the set route, and I could have gone after Maverick to see that he got safely down, or back up. These and many other “should have, could have, would have” questions will haunt my experience.

Lessons and Conclusions

I have learned that the mantle of leadership, once taken, requires that person to be more “alpha male” than any other in the group. I know that “alpha male” is not a normal position in my character. I do not find it easy to yell at people I have just met and to tell them where they can and cannot go. On past hikes/climbs that I have led, a more laid-back style has always sufficed, but when faced with a mutiny, I utterly failed in my responsibilities. For this failure I owe and extend to the entire group my sincerest apology.

What I have concluded in retrospect is that it will be amazing if any of these people ever climb with me again, especially if I am in a leadership role, because my lack of solid leadership put 11 people in a situation that could have very well turned tragic. I sincerely regret not recognizing and taking the opportunities that were presented me to forcefully let it be known that the group I was leading would be staying on our set route. If this had been a military sojourn, I would likely be facing courts martial right alongside the mutineers. At the very least, I would not get that next promotion and my career would be over.

Which leads me to my final conclusion: From here on out, I will stick to climbing with people and partners that I know and trust.

I appreciate any feedback, positive or negative, that fellow Summitposters care to extend, because my purpose is to learn all of the lessons from this experience.
Cliff-Bands and Shrubs

Thanks

Thanks are due to:

Bob Sihler for his thoughtful editing.

thephotohiker for the use of some of his terrific photos.

saintgrizzly, for the use of some of his photos also.

Comments

Post a Comment
Viewing: 41-60 of 79
T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 1, 2008 7:10 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: thanks

I appreciate your enlightened comments mvs. Descending unknown couloirs is about as big a gamble as a mountaineer or peak bagger can take.
Sometimes a group gets lucky and there is a way down, like what happened with us.
Cheers;
Tim

Neven - Sep 7, 2008 8:58 pm - Hasn't voted

Care for the responsible ones

Tim,
Thank you for a thought provoking article. I am sure many readers experienced similar situations leading a heterogeneous group and faced similar challenges. My experience is with mush less dangeorous hikes that the one you described but here are my thoughts anyway.

I believe that the leader is responsible for those in the group that follow his or her leadership; everybody is, of course, free to leave the group but they do that at their own risk. The difficult part emotionally is not to be sidetracked by worries about the safety of the renegades but stay focused on the safety of loyalists.

Last but not least, I would say you are a good leader as evidenced by your care and effort to improve. I hope you will continue leading many climbs and hikes inthe future.

Best,

Neven

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 9, 2008 12:05 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Care for the responsible ones

Thank you Neven for your kind and perceptive comments. I was difficult emotionally for some in the group to reject the set route. My decision not to split up the group was colored by that fact.
Cheers;
Tim

mhimber

mhimber - Sep 10, 2008 3:58 am - Voted 10/10

misunderstanding on the rogue couloir

first of all, the english teacher in me wants to thank you for this well written, guileless, and perceptive article on group leadership. i strongly agree with thephotohiker in that the alpha male (or female!) figure need not "bite" or strong arm his or her parishioners into militeristic submission. this should especially be the case when a group of (theoretically) capable adults sign up for an organized climb led by an experienced climber familiar with the route.

also in a group of capable adults its easy to assume that everyone would have the same climbing ethics on a group outing (ie respect for the leaders and group safety). one of the things that i've learned from working with high school students (and perhaps adults are no different as people are people) is to never assume anything no matter how obvious it might seem or how large of a majority in the group seem to demonstrate an understanding of what is about to take place.

when going into a new classroom i found i have much more success when i outline what i'm teaching, why i'm teaching it, what students can expect from me, and what i expect from them before starting any actual lessons. prior to reading your article i don't think i would have thought a debriefing on expectations would have been necessary for a group like yours, though in retrospect it may have elimated problems such as deciding if and when you needed to yell or how hard of a punch maverick's nose would have required to punish his poor choice and re-establish authority.

in maverick's defense (and as i don't think has yet been mentioned in this discussion), he did ask permission (which was granted) from the coleader in regard to checking out the couloir. it was the coleader's assumption (and it seems the impression maverick gave him and others) that this would be a scouting descent. however, maverick evidently figured if it was a go then it was a go and it seems the next thing you knew, they were gone. i don't think you need to fire yourself from leading large groups (though if you're disillusioned enough to never desire to lead one again i can certainly understand). additionally as a fledgling (becoming less of a fledgling) climber, i too have trusted and continue to trust you above all others.

the mutiny on gray wolf peak is a valuable learning experience for all who lead and participate in the climbing community. participating climbers as well as leaders are responsible for the safety of the group. in a case like this what was safe for the group was staying on the planned route and letting the leaders lead. in the future, i would advise establishing clear route and safety expectations prior to the climb, as well as a more thorough dialogue between the co-leader and maverick regarding maverick's exploratory intentions.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 11, 2008 12:13 am - Hasn't voted

Re: misunderstanding on the rogue couloir

Thanks Meleah for the the kind and insightful comments regarding this article. I can see the parallel in teaching a class of high school kids, and leading a group of 12 climbers, they are both similar to herding cats!
Rest assured that if I ever climb into the rats nest of large group leadership again, I will set some very clear boundaries from the outset as has been advised by many others.
Cheers;
Tim

dinwoody

dinwoody - Sep 16, 2008 2:04 pm - Hasn't voted

Herding cats

Nice article Tim. I have to agree with others that you are being too hard on yourself. The gentle encouragement and upbeat enthusiasm I've seen you offer others on trips like this is a very effective leadership style. Some folks (myself included) don't deal well with authoritative, aplha male style leaders. Others are just morons. I know that there are things you would like to have done differently, but the bottom line is that you helped everyone get down safely.

Take it easy.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 18, 2008 1:14 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Herding cats

Thanks for the insightful comments dinwoody! The trip as well as this article have been a valuable learning experience!
Cheers;
Tim

silversummit

silversummit - Sep 21, 2008 7:55 pm - Voted 10/10

Big impression on me

I first read your article awhile back and it really hit home for me. As a Scout leader I work with less experienced adults and scouts all the time. People outside occasionally ask "How do you handle the responsibility...of all these lives?" I used to give a kind of glib answer like "I'm used to planning and preparing and know what to do when things go wrong." But your article reminded me that there were a couple times in the past few years when maybe I didn't do what was the best for the group even though things worked out okay. Perhaps I'll write something up for SP since one of them involved hiking in GNP. Anyway, I truly appreciated what you wrote and I can understand a little about how you felt. I am so glad you wrote it up for others to learn from, if they wish.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 21, 2008 9:41 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Big impression on me

Thanks for your comment silversummit. While I felt confidant about dealing with most emergency situations, [first aid, weather, bivouc, etc.]it was proven to me that there are incidents that I was not prepared for. Since I was given the opportunity to learn, I felt compelled to share the experience with others, so that they might not be caught flat footed [so to speak]as I was.
I would encourage you to write about your experience in GNP!
Cheers;
Tim

ekestes

ekestes - Sep 22, 2008 8:12 pm - Voted 10/10

Glad you made it out safely

I too think that you're being a bit hard on yourself. The bottom line is that you can't force people to follow your lead, and shouldn't hold yourself responsible for the poor judgment of others. Perhaps you should have vocalized your opposition a bit more, just to make it clear to the group that you didn't approve of the route. But hindsight is 20/20. The important things are that you made it out without incident, you kept the group together, and it sounds like you learned a lesson. I've had similar experiences, and I ultimately came to the same conclusion: "From here on out, I will stick to climbing with people and partners that I know and trust." I personally think this is the only way to go. There's just too much at stake to go with people whose character, judgment, and respectfulness have not been proven.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 23, 2008 12:32 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Glad you made it out safely

Thank You ekestes for the understanding comment! It is interesting that similar experiences led us to similar conclusions. As my rock partner says " life is too short to climb with shitty partners, or drink shitty beer"!
Cheers;
Tim

T Sharp

T Sharp - Sep 24, 2008 11:58 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Leader?

Thanks for your comments thoth. As you might suspect, I have belonged to climbing clubs for quite a few years, and even started one with my mountaineering partner Luke [RIP]. I have found them to be very good places to meet like minded people who share a love of wild places, they do however bring baggage to the day also. Most clubs necessarily require a trip leader who can coordinate logistics, and who will hopefully have some knowledge of the intended route. Although I am not a professional guide, my responsibilities for such an outing are similar, and I do not mind taking on that role, in fact I see it as helping to pay my dues to the club. My shortcomings in this instance serve as a lesson for the learning, cemented by the many considered comments to this narrative by SP members like yourself.
Best Regards;
Tim

Scott Pierce

Scott Pierce - Oct 11, 2008 2:20 pm - Hasn't voted

Techniques

Tim- very interesting and I think a fairly common occurence, especially in larger groups. I agree with dscharfman...I have found that being very clear about the rules before leaving the trailhead, and referring back to them frequently during the outing is a good way to control the group. Especially for a larger group such as you describe, I think a good technique is to tell the followers how important it is to stay as a group, and to make sure they understand that trying to outpace the leader or lagging behind the co-leader, or deviating from the route, will bring a sharp and immediate correction. I recommend for purposes of group control that as a rule of thumb, the senior leader ascends in the lead locomotive position and descends as the caboose. I have often watched professional guides at work, and rule #1 is controlling where the clients are at all times. A club outing and a guided climb are not the same thing, but neither are they totally dissimilar.

Don't beat yourself up too badly--take out a big group of strangers again soon. You will find surprising satisfaction from the success you experience when you apply your increasing quiver of group management and leadership techniques, and more importantly, the members of the group you lead will have a safer, more enjoyable mountain outing for having had the benefit of your seasoning and savvy. Go get 'em!

Scott

T Sharp

T Sharp - Oct 11, 2008 8:10 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Techniques

Thank you Scott for your good advice on leadership technique.
This article has rendered many interesting and considered comments, and I value them all. Yours is the first to overtly recommend getting back up on the horse....I don`t know.....maybe.
Cheers;
Tim

NoSubas

NoSubas - Dec 15, 2008 3:57 pm - Hasn't voted

Too many people

It's a shame to take such a large group into this area and I think it should be avoided in the future. Regardless of the dynamics of the group and the outcome...it would never have happened if you just kept places like this to yourself.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Dec 16, 2008 1:40 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Too many people

Thanks NoSubas for taking the time to comment on this article.

The group of "Too many people" are all local climbers/hikers, who regularly "share" their secrets of Glacier National Park, and other wondrous mountains of Western Montana. Part of being in an mountaineering society is the fellowship of great mountains with good partners, the drag of being in a mountaineering society is that sometimes, some of the partners are not equal to the setting.
I feel I covered the "would have, should have, and could have" aspects, as I explored the lessons learned. As I am not "alpha" I am also not covetous, and I do not consider that not taking the group should be one of the lessons learned. I did not discover the Joy of the mountain environment all of my own accord, it was gifted me by many gracious teachers. I hope to pass along the tradition.
I do not wish to be argumentative, but I am curious; Why it is a "shame" to bring "such a large group" to Gray Wolf?

NoSubas

NoSubas - Dec 16, 2008 2:18 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Too many people

Gray Wolf and surrounding mountains are all in a wilderness setting. There is nothing more dreadful than running into a crowd of hikers in an area where humans are rare. I know this area sees considerable traffic, nonetheless I think it takes away from the setting to have large groups of humans in wilderness places, particularly those like Gray Wolf which are largely undeveloped. Sure, I think that mountaineering societys are great, but don't need to take all of the membership into the mtns at once to exist and/or profilerate.

Saintgrizzly

Saintgrizzly - Dec 16, 2008 10:56 pm - Voted 10/10

Re: Too many people

"...don't need to take all of the membership into the mtns at once to exist and/or proliferate."

GMS has about 400 active members, most of whom weren't on the Gray Wolf climb.

T Sharp

T Sharp - Dec 17, 2008 12:02 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Too many people

From a leave no trace stand point, I can maybe see where you could be coming from, from a my girlfriend and I only want to see each other when we are backpacking stand point, I can only say too bad.
We were day hiking, not camping, and as such our impact was minimal. We did run into 2 different groups of 4 camping at Upper Riddel Lake. We walked considerably away from their camps, even though they were camped right along the trail. So their exposure to our group was maybe 5-10 minutes. Bummer to think we might have ruined their experience by being in that basin.

NoSubas

NoSubas - Dec 17, 2008 7:18 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Too many people

nice smug reply saint. I'm not impressed by the big numbers.

Viewing: 41-60 of 79


Parents 

Parents

Parents refers to a larger category under which an object falls. For example, theAconcagua mountain page has the 'Aconcagua Group' and the 'Seven Summits' asparents and is a parent itself to many routes, photos, and Trip Reports.