Here is a picture to solve...

Here is a picture to solve this debate. Obviously not a photograph, it is an image I created with a Visual Basic program I wrote that uses USGS data. In this case, the data are 1/3-arc-second data from the National Elevation Dataset. The benefit of creating an image is it allows one to identify the lat/lon of points on the image, since my program keeps track of the coordinates corresponding to each pixel in the image. Compare this image to the picture in the debate. I made mine so that it is the same size as the other. Save both pictures to your hard drive, and alternately view one and then the other to see that they are viewing the same mountains from roughly the same perspective. (I had to guess at Dennis Poulin's viewpoint for his photograph, but I would say I came pretty close. I made the program shade in red the elevations over 5240 feet, so the summits of Stewart would show. The coordinates of Stewart and several other points have been indicated on the picture. If you input these coordinates on Topozone, you can see the location of each point. The other peaks to the right of Stewart are not to the north; they are to the northeast. In this picture, the "bump to the south" is not visible; it is off picture to the left. But in this photo, the "bump to the south" can be seen, and its position can be seen at 36.1576, -116.2038 on Topozone. Stewart is labeled correctly on the picture in the debate, and it is also labeled correctly on the pictures here and here.