Viewing: 1-2 of 2
livioz - Sep 24, 2005 4:09 pm - Hasn't voted
Interesting comparison...Also if the variations (after 20 years) seem less evident than elsewhere: probably the more important changes are in the depth of the glacier, rather than into the extent.
Thanks for posting (both photos)
Lupino - Sep 25, 2005 4:17 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Interesting comparison...Maybe the photo is less clear than the caption says. The main difference is certainly in depth but also in the withdrawal of the glacier's mouth. Ther fault is mine if there is not the "right" photo !
Viewing: 1-2 of 2
Comments
Post a Comment