This page is a good start but mountain pages need more information. You might describe the region a little more, including something on the Buttermilks. You absolutely need to give a more detailed description of the route to the top, as well as removing the "Add External Links text here" bit.
hightinerary - Dec 12, 2011 2:35 pm - Hasn't voted
Typos?
Are you sure about that height? I was thinking maybe you meant 6,035 instead of 6,305.
Bubba Suess - Nov 30, 2010 11:47 pm - Hasn't voted
Needs more...This page is a good start but mountain pages need more information. You might describe the region a little more, including something on the Buttermilks. You absolutely need to give a more detailed description of the route to the top, as well as removing the "Add External Links text here" bit.
hightinerary - Dec 12, 2011 2:35 pm - Hasn't voted
Typos?Are you sure about that height? I was thinking maybe you meant 6,035 instead of 6,305.
SierraCJ - Dec 12, 2011 4:21 pm - Hasn't voted
My bad.....You're right. The register does say 6035 ft. I will change, thanks a lot.