Thanks for the confidence! The Photos are up - since Fred was carrying the camera, they came out very well. There are some more on another film we have to finish first.
I might just have a picture of this peak from the road. It looks familiar. As I recall, there were a lot of neat looking peaks north of the road by the developed area. I know I have one of Mt. Wilbur from there.
Excellent, Moni! This time there seems to be a "tag problem" with your "Route" and "Climbing Consideration" sections. They change colour as I move the cursor over them ?!?
With 4,000' of gain in such a short distance, you should create a more descriptive, individual route page. Trail starts at 4,000 feet? Class 2 moves, Class 3 or 4 moves in more detail?
The photo seems to show the route nearly self-explanatory, but still deserves its own page. Otherwise, good work, still 4 stars.
Yea - another system but these mountains are so vastly different that the American systems in use won't do it. Actually the European grading system would be okay - in which case Mt Henkel is F
Yep, I was on Sulphide Glacier on Mt. Shuksan this weekend so I can definitely vouch for the abundance there. Heard a large chunk calve off of the Crystal Glacier while we were there too. Quite an awesome sound when that happens.
rpc - Jun 23, 2004 11:20 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentI'm sure the photos will be very nice as usual. Great page so far.
Moni - Jun 23, 2004 12:18 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the confidence! The Photos are up - since Fred was carrying the camera, they came out very well. There are some more on another film we have to finish first.
Klenke - Jun 23, 2004 12:34 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentAnother nice Glacier National Park page. Thanks.
I might just have a picture of this peak from the road. It looks familiar. As I recall, there were a lot of neat looking peaks north of the road by the developed area. I know I have one of Mt. Wilbur from there.
Moni - Jun 23, 2004 1:08 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the vote. There are great looking peaks all around; it's hard to decide what to do next!
Gangolf Haub - Jun 23, 2004 1:10 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentExcellent, Moni! This time there seems to be a "tag problem" with your "Route" and "Climbing Consideration" sections. They change colour as I move the cursor over them ?!?
Nothing serious I suppose ;-)
Cheers
Gangolf
hgrapid - Jun 23, 2004 1:21 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWith 4,000' of gain in such a short distance, you should create a more descriptive, individual route page. Trail starts at 4,000 feet? Class 2 moves, Class 3 or 4 moves in more detail?
The photo seems to show the route nearly self-explanatory, but still deserves its own page. Otherwise, good work, still 4 stars.
Nelson - Jun 23, 2004 3:46 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page, but Yet Another Rating System?!! Aaarrrg! :o}
Moni - Jun 25, 2004 5:43 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentYea - another system but these mountains are so vastly different that the American systems in use won't do it. Actually the European grading system would be okay - in which case Mt Henkel is F
Brian Jenkins - Jun 23, 2004 3:53 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentOh, I looked hard for an "it's" that should be an "its" on your page but could fine none. ;- )
Excellent page. I really must get to Glacier soon before it all melts and it is simply called "National Park".
Moni - Jun 25, 2004 5:41 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentWell, after chiding you for your typos - I had better make damn sure I haven't any! :-)
Thanks for the vote.
By the way, GNP is named for the fact that glaciers carved it, not that it has any - in fact it has very few. The North Cascades has far more.
Brian Jenkins - Jun 28, 2004 1:11 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentYep, I was on Sulphide Glacier on Mt. Shuksan this weekend so I can definitely vouch for the abundance there. Heard a large chunk calve off of the Crystal Glacier while we were there too. Quite an awesome sound when that happens.
Martin Cash - Jun 23, 2004 4:09 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page.
Moni - Jun 25, 2004 5:45 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks Martin!
mtwashingtonmonroe - Jun 23, 2004 6:08 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentBeautiful mountain and beautiful page you've got! Good job! Good climbing to you!
Moni - Jun 25, 2004 5:40 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the vote and kind comments.
Aaron Johnson - Jun 23, 2004 6:11 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWonderful! Looking forward to climbing in Glacier later this season!
Jerry L - Jun 23, 2004 7:26 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat page. Can't wait for that to be my backyard. Thanks for posting.
Moni - Jun 25, 2004 5:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentYes - it's a good introduction to basic GNP climbing!
Thanks for the vote
BobSmith - Jun 23, 2004 8:27 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentBeautiful peak!
Alan Ellis - Jun 23, 2004 10:35 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentExcellent!