I consider this peak to be a Washington Top 100 considering it meets the requirements of being a peak in the state of Washington. If Sahale Mountain can be a Bulgar, then this peak then even more deserves to be one!
I think it's a great idea. Sherman is a good sub-peak and this a good SP page. So this brings up the question, do Colfax and Lincoln deserve a page as well? I believe they do. They are labelled as separate peaks on maps and for many climbers, they are the main objective.
Josh, regardless of placement on lists or not (not of interest to me, really), you ought to attach this as a child to Baker since it is a distinct peak on it. Having a mountain as a child to another has been done plenty of times before here, and it makes perfect sense in this case.
Done. When I first made this page I considered doing that. As a compromise I added it as related, but considering that it's appropriate to add it as a child I removed it from "related" and added it. Thanks for your input. :-D
Thanks Kiefer! I try and do my best when making mountain pages. Recently I been studying for hours on css and how to style pages. It's easy to style something up, but takes a while to get it at just the right tone.
Thanks Andinistaloco, I prefer good peaks over not as fun peaks that make certain lists. Perhaps that's why I don't have as many Bulgers as I "should". Thanks for your compliment. :-)
Thanks Dean. I been busy with other pages and such, but I do plan on fixing up Little Annapurna and Enchantment Peaks. It usually takes me a long time for me to get around to working on a page. But when ever I start the work, I usually don't stop until the page is in very good shape.
Redwic - Mar 11, 2012 3:11 am - Voted 10/10
Hmmm...When I first saw this page, I thought to myself: Really? That peak is part of Mount Baker, a volcano!
But considering this peak is on the Washington Top 100 for 400' Prominence list, this peak page definitely has a spot on SP.
Good job.
Matt Lemke - Mar 11, 2012 7:25 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Hmmm...I'd say this peak deserves a page however it certainly is not on my list of WA top 100 as I follow the Bulger list.
Nice page though
Redwic - Mar 12, 2012 1:06 am - Voted 10/10
Re: Hmmm...Both lists have flaws, exceptions, etc.
Neither list is completely true to form.
But both are loads of fun!!!
Josh Lewis - Mar 12, 2012 9:37 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Hmmm...I consider this peak to be a Washington Top 100 considering it meets the requirements of being a peak in the state of Washington. If Sahale Mountain can be a Bulgar, then this peak then even more deserves to be one!
gimpilator - Mar 13, 2012 8:57 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Hmmm...I think it's a great idea. Sherman is a good sub-peak and this a good SP page. So this brings up the question, do Colfax and Lincoln deserve a page as well? I believe they do. They are labelled as separate peaks on maps and for many climbers, they are the main objective.
Redwic - Mar 14, 2012 6:00 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Hmmm...Apparently, you do not know the "Who Shot Lincoln" rule for the Washington Top 100. ;-)
Bob Sihler - Mar 14, 2012 6:47 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Hmmm...Josh, regardless of placement on lists or not (not of interest to me, really), you ought to attach this as a child to Baker since it is a distinct peak on it. Having a mountain as a child to another has been done plenty of times before here, and it makes perfect sense in this case.
Josh Lewis - Mar 14, 2012 7:24 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Hmmm...Done. When I first made this page I considered doing that. As a compromise I added it as related, but considering that it's appropriate to add it as a child I removed it from "related" and added it. Thanks for your input. :-D
Sarah Simon - Mar 11, 2012 12:12 pm - Voted 10/10
Highly informative, beautiful imagesNice work, Josh. -Sarah
Josh Lewis - Mar 12, 2012 9:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Highly informative, beautiful imagesThanks Sarah, glad you liked the pictures. Certainly a beautiful peak of the North Cascades.
EastKing - Mar 11, 2012 9:35 pm - Voted 10/10
Excellent add....Pictures are fantasic!!!!
Josh Lewis - Mar 12, 2012 9:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Excellent add....Thanks Eastking, you should climb this peak one of these days!
Kiefer - Jul 31, 2012 4:14 am - Voted 10/10
I have to...echo what Sarah said. This page looks fuc*in fantastic!
This is the caliber that SP needs more of!
You hit this one out of the ballpark, Josh. A++
Josh Lewis - Aug 1, 2012 3:38 am - Hasn't voted
Re: I have to...Thanks Kiefer! I try and do my best when making mountain pages. Recently I been studying for hours on css and how to style pages. It's easy to style something up, but takes a while to get it at just the right tone.
Andinistaloco - Aug 4, 2012 12:11 pm - Voted 10/10
Nice work!I couldn't care less what lists this summit is on... you've done a fine job here!
Josh Lewis - Aug 4, 2012 3:43 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Nice work!Thanks Andinistaloco, I prefer good peaks over not as fun peaks that make certain lists. Perhaps that's why I don't have as many Bulgers as I "should". Thanks for your compliment. :-)
Dean - Aug 15, 2012 11:31 pm - Voted 10/10
A little belated on my part..Funny, I just saw this page thanks to it being on the SP front page. Excellent page.
Josh Lewis - Aug 16, 2012 7:34 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: A little belated on my part..Thanks Dean. I been busy with other pages and such, but I do plan on fixing up Little Annapurna and Enchantment Peaks. It usually takes me a long time for me to get around to working on a page. But when ever I start the work, I usually don't stop until the page is in very good shape.