It's worth mentioning that aside from the named summit there is another point a third of a mile to the north which is nearly the same height, likely within 10 feet.
I would be curious to know if anyone has information about survey findings and what the actual height of the northern summit is. Historically, contenders like this one occasionally prove to be the highest point. Thorough peakbaggers should probably visit both points unless it can be proved beyond the shadow of a doubt.
IdahoKid - Dec 26, 2005 12:46 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentGood page Steve but I just can't pull out 4 stars until there are some photos of the mountain...let me know.
Sean
2skinners - Dec 28, 2005 1:01 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page. How do you get the medium sized picture in your overview section? I think it looks better than having a larger picture there in some cases.
Gangolf Haub - Dec 28, 2005 10:47 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentA ski area that occasionally gets enough snow to operate adorns the north slopes.
Would that be an occasional ski area?
Nice page!
wildstar - Dec 31, 2005 4:56 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page.
Rob - Jan 28, 2008 2:00 pm - Voted 10/10
Ski area websiteSkiWaterman.com
gimpilator - Dec 12, 2014 3:58 pm - Hasn't voted
Summit ContenderIt's worth mentioning that aside from the named summit there is another point a third of a mile to the north which is nearly the same height, likely within 10 feet.
I would be curious to know if anyone has information about survey findings and what the actual height of the northern summit is. Historically, contenders like this one occasionally prove to be the highest point. Thorough peakbaggers should probably visit both points unless it can be proved beyond the shadow of a doubt.