Thanks Vernon. I haven't had the chance to do much exploring in the Pioneers (yet), but what I have seen is very rugged and beautiful. The Goat and Betty Lakes area and surrounding peaks are particularly nice.
You should make the distinction in the table that the peaks have neither official nor unofficial names. You explain it in the text, but most people won't read it in detail.
It's worth noting that Point 11887 is probably not the summit which also means that's probably not the elevation. There's a larger 11880' contour (850' to the north) with a small tower within it, and it appears higher from every perspective.
Saintgrizzly - Jan 11, 2007 3:37 am - Voted 10/10
Very, very nice!The more I see of the Pioneers, the more impressed I get. At this point I'm QUITE impressed!
Super Dave - Jan 11, 2007 6:15 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Very, very nice!Thanks Vernon. I haven't had the chance to do much exploring in the Pioneers (yet), but what I have seen is very rugged and beautiful. The Goat and Betty Lakes area and surrounding peaks are particularly nice.
brendon - Jan 11, 2007 4:18 am - Voted 10/10
Unnamed-unnamed PeaksYou should make the distinction in the table that the peaks have neither official nor unofficial names. You explain it in the text, but most people won't read it in detail.
Good page. Thanks for using my 11er/12er list!
Super Dave - Jan 11, 2007 4:52 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Unnamed-unnamed PeaksThanks for the feedback Brendon. I added a note to the bottom of the table to help clarify.
I look at your list all the time. Its awesome!
derekperc - Jul 18, 2019 2:34 pm - Hasn't voted
2 potential highpointsIt's worth noting that Point 11887 is probably not the summit which also means that's probably not the elevation. There's a larger 11880' contour (850' to the north) with a small tower within it, and it appears higher from every perspective.