Hayford Peak access threat

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Great American Southwest. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the Southwest US Climbing Partners section.
User Avatar
jfrishmanIII

 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:02 pm
Thanked: 36 times in 26 posts

Hayford Peak access threat

by jfrishmanIII » Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:01 pm

Peakbaggers and outdoor adventurers ought to be aware that the U.S. Air Force is proposing to expand the Nellis Test and Training Range and take over 227,000 acres of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge. Public access to this area would be lost, placing Hayford Peak (an ultra-prominence peak), Sheep Peak, Hidden Forest Canyon and the Alamo Road off-limits. This would make Hayford the only lower 48 Ultra without legal access. It would cause big problems with scientific monitoring and management of the desert bighorn population (the whole reason for Desert NWR), and be a major loss for remote, uncrowded recreational opportunities in southern Nevada.

Public comments will be collected until December 10, 2016. Submit comments here: http://www.nttrleis.com/comment.aspx Ultimately, it is Congress that will decide, but recreationalists should make their opinions known in the EIS. Make your voice heard, or else plan to climb Hayford in the near future to kiss it goodbye.

For plenty more details and guidelines for effective commenting, Friends of Nevada Wilderness and Basin and Range Watch have helpful resources:
http://www.nevadawilderness.org/dnwr
http://basinandrangewatch.org/Military-Base-expansion.html

The following user would like to thank jfrishmanIII for this post
jdzaharia, orbitor, surgent

User Avatar
surgent

 
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:45 pm
Thanked: 143 times in 80 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by surgent » Sat Oct 22, 2016 1:15 am

I submitted my comments. Thanks for bringing this to broader attention. The Sheep Range really is a beautiful place. You don;t want to have this whole range suddenly off-limits.

The following user would like to thank surgent for this post
jfrishmanIII, orbitor

User Avatar
orbitor

 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:31 pm
Thanked: 13 times in 3 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by orbitor » Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:01 pm

I have also submitted comments expressing concern about the proposed withdrawal of public lands, and urge others to do the same before the December 10, 2016 deadline.

Thank you also to jfrishmanIII for spreading the word about this situation. The Basin and Range Watch page in particular has a very useful discussion of the nature of the expansion and how it would affect the Desert National Wildlife Refuge. I recommend using this and other resources for making informed comments.

The following user would like to thank orbitor for this post
jfrishmanIII

User Avatar
spiderman

 
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:47 am
Thanked: 16 times in 13 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by spiderman » Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:29 pm

I submitted my comments also. I would hate to see the mountain removed from the Public. My son and I loved our trip up there last year.

The following user would like to thank spiderman for this post
jfrishmanIII

User Avatar
lasvegaswraith

 
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:13 pm
Thanked: 8 times in 8 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by lasvegaswraith » Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:42 am

Submitted comments and bump to thread. Sheep Range is far to rare an area to So NV to lose to another Federal appropriation. NTTR already has control over 2 million acres.

The following user would like to thank lasvegaswraith for this post
jfrishmanIII

User Avatar
jfrishmanIII

 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:02 pm
Thanked: 36 times in 26 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by jfrishmanIII » Tue Dec 06, 2016 4:16 pm

Bump. Please comment on the proposed military takeover of Hayford Peak and Desert National Wildlife Refuge by the December 10th deadline. Feel free to repurpose language from my own comment (at the link below). And please share wherever you can!

https://frishmanphoto.wordpress.com/2016/12/06/preserve-the-desert-national-wildlife-refuge/

User Avatar
surgent

 
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:45 pm
Thanked: 143 times in 80 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by surgent » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:00 pm

It appears that Hayford Peak will remain publicly accessible. Here is a map showing the proposed expansion of the Nellis Range (the blue lines):

http://www.nttrleis.com/Preliminary%20P ... e%203C.pdf

Thanks to Andy Martin and Ron Moe for circulating this.

Note that the new boundaries will abut Alamo Road, so peaks west of this road will be off limits...

User Avatar
jfrishmanIII

 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:02 pm
Thanked: 36 times in 26 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by jfrishmanIII » Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:18 pm

That's a map of one proposed alternative, so it's certainly not a done deal. Nice to see that Hidden Forest and Hayford remain accessible under that alternative, but note the loss of Alamo Road north of the Hidden Forest turnoff, and the loss of Desert Dry Lake.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by MoapaPk » Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:38 pm

That map suggests lots of prime areas would become inaccessible, e.g.
http://hwstock.org/ram3/

My biased view: the USAF has been dropping stuff (gas drop tanks, radar targets) on that area for years without oversight. They want to change their illegal activities to legal by fiat.

The following user would like to thank MoapaPk for this post
jfrishmanIII

User Avatar
jfrishmanIII

 
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:02 pm
Thanked: 36 times in 26 posts

Re: Hayford Peak access threat

by jfrishmanIII » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:25 am



Return to Southwest (AZ, NM, NV, TX)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests